Posts Tagged ‘argument’

Expressing Ourselves: Want to Be Heard?

October 18th, 2009

The Mary Mackenzieother side of empathy or deep listening is to find ways of expressing ourselves that make us more easily heard.  Certified Nonviolent Communication Trainer, Author and Mediator Mary Mackenzie offers this perspective:

When you express your feelings, try to use words that convey emotions rather than thoughts. Emotion words include sadness, happy, excitement, joy, fear, and hurt. Thought words express a judgment about someone else, such as feeling manipulated, abandoned, rejected, or abused. Each of these words expresses your opinion of the other person’s actions: that she is manipulative or abusive, or that she has abandoned or rejected you. When we focus on how we actually feel about something, rather than judge the other person, we are more likely to be heard. If your wife made plans to go away for the weekend without discussing it with you first, you might feel annoyed, hurt, angry, or confused. If you tell her that you feel abandoned or rejected, she is likely to respond defensively. Express your feelings in a way that connects to others and yourself rather than mixing in your opinions and judgments, which can lead you to disconnect. Disconnecting promotes argument. Connecting promotes resolution.
—Mary Mackenzie

This reflection is an excerpt from  Peaceful Living: Daily Meditations for Living with Love, Healing, and Compassion by Mary Mackenzie, published by PuddleDancer Press, and is offered courtesy of NVC Academy and Mary Mackenzie.

We invite you to share this reflection with your friends and family if you imagine they might enjoy it.  They may also receive their own weekly reflection by email by signing up at the following Stay In Touch page.

Monty Python’s Argument Service

October 12th, 2009

Here’s a fun video from Monty Python’s Flying Circus…

Here’s how I reacted and what I observed watching this video:

  1. I found myself thinking : John Cleese is “in denial.” He is argumentative, or obstinate, or an idiot!  Empathy asks me to set my judgments aside, even if just for a moment, to listen.
  2. I observed: Both parties keep stating and restating their positions. Each is right and the other wrong. Neither is willing to listen to the other by temporarily setting aside their own view.
  3. I observed: They do not agree about simple concrete observation, like the span of time or the words that were just spoken, or payment of money. This is an important piece of information that helps me determine how to make a connection with the other person. Having a simple shared “reality” like agreeing that I gave you money gives us a place to begin a conversation.  Still, agreeing isn’t needed for empathy, in fact, it can be an obstacle. With empathy, I’m only trying to be present for and understand the other.